标题：Efficacy of Enhanced External Counterpulsation in Patients With Chronic Refractory Angina on Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Angina Class An Updated Meta-Analysis
作者：Zhang, Chunmei; Liu, Xiangjuan; Wang, Xiaomeng; Wang, Qi; Zhang, Yun; Ge, Zhiming
作者机构：[Zhang, CM; Liu, XJ; Wang, XM; Wang, Q; Zhang, Y; Ge, ZM]Shandong Univ, Qilu Hosp, Chinese Minist Educ, Key Lab Cardiovasc Remodeling & Func 更多
通讯作者地址：[Ge, ZM]Shandong Univ, Qilu Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Wen Hua Xi Rd 107, Jinan 250012, Shandong, Peoples R China.
摘要：A growing number of patients with chronic artery disease suffer from angina, despite the optimal medical management (ie, -blockers, calcium channel blockers, and long-acting nitrates) and revascularization. Currently, enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) therapy has been verified as a noninvasive, safe therapy for refractory angina. The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of EECP in patients with chronic refractory angina according to Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina class.We identified systematic literature through MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Clinical Trials Register Database, and the ClinicalTrials. gov Website from 1990 to 2015. Studies were considered eligible if they were prospective and reported data on CCS class before and after EECP treatment. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of EECP therapy by at least 1 CCS angina class improvement, and proportion along with the 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Statistical heterogeneity was calculated by I-2 statistic and the Q statistic. Sensitivity analysis was addressed to test the influence of trials on the overall pooled results. Subgroup analysis was applied to explore potential reasons for heterogeneity.Eighteen studies were enrolled in our meta-analysis. Pooled analysis showed 85% of patients underwent EECP had a reduction by at least one CCS class (95%CI 0.81-0.88, I-2=58.5%, P<0.001). The proportion of patients enrolled at primarily different studies with chronic heart failure (CHF) improved by at least 1 CCS class was about 84% after EECP (95%CI 0.81-0.88, I-2=32.7%, P=0.1668). After 3 large studies were excluded, the pooled proportion was 82% (95%CI 0.79-0.86, I-2=18%, P=0.2528). Funnel plot indicated that some asymmetry while the Begg and Egger bias statistic showed no publication bias (P=0.1495 and 0.2859, respectively).Our study confirmed that EECP provided an effective treatment for patients who were unresponsive to medical management and/or invasive therapy. However, the long-term benefits of EECP therapy needed further studies to evaluate in the management of chronic refractory angina.